The most important legal points achieved so far

Court proceedings reveal Judges’ observations:

1. the inconsistencies in TFL’s application of its own procedures and by-laws in banning the CIT advert, but not the Stonewall advert, nor the British Humanist advert before it;
2. that TFL had failed to properly protect evidence and to provide the court with documentary evidence
3. that those presenting an ‘ex-gay’ identity are fully protected under the Equality Act of 2010 and that discrimination against this group is illegal, and
4. that Mayor Boris Johnson had been dishonest (by denying he had personally acted in banning the advertisement) but was not legally  dishonest in doing so.